Friday, September 26, 2014

A Religion of Lies

When I was in high school, my parents and pastors taught me several things about other religions.  One of the things they told me was that it's considered a moral imperative in Islam to lie to Christians.  This 'fact' was then used as a method of denying any claim a Muslim made to the contrary - of course Muslims would say that their Qur'an says nothing of the sort, because they're supposed to lie!

I still see this today.  It's a belief about Islam that has persisted despite all of the world's attempts to answer it. Just in a brief search online, I found many sites making claims that support that belief:

On a site with an Orwellian name, MuslimFact.com, Don Boys argues that "Islam permits lying to deceive unbelievers and bring world domination," explaining that this right to lie is called "Al-taqiyya" and that it can be used in several fairly common-place scenarios, such as saving someone's life.

This is somewhat true, actually.  The Qur'an appears to be saying - although I'm no scholar of the Qur'an and do not speak Arabic to read it untranslated - that Muslims shouldn't lie in general but can do so in order to accomplish good things, such as saving lives and reconciling people together.  Boys acknowledges that Christians lie, too, but then brushes that under the rug by the argument that we're not given specific permission to lie, and will therefore feel guilt for it.  That's clearly working out for the vast majority of Christians. 

He then follows a slippery slope argument down to its most absurd conclusion, setting it up as follows:

"Muslims have no hope for eternal salvation without their good works, so they must keep working to advance Islam. If a few lies will accomplish that goal, then lying is not bad but good. If they can get good publicity for Islam by lying, then lying is acceptable, even desirable. The Muslim is earning his way to heaven by lying to a non-Muslim."

Wow... where to begin?   First, this assumes (and Boys acknowledges the assumption without apparently realizing what he's saying) that Muslims don't have Christ and therefore their salvation isn't guaranteed.  Well, that's true, except that as Beth Davies-Stofka on patheos.com explains, "Islam does not teach that humans need intercession."  That is, Christ is neither capable of providing a bridge between individuals and God, nor does He need to.  Muslims can go directly to God for their salvation, and receive forgiveness from their sins directly from that source by repenting.  For that moment of salvation, Davies-Stofka explains, "At the end of time, all people will be rewarded or punished according to how well they followed the instructions contained in God's revelations to his prophets."  Well, that kind of sounds familiar, like the idea of St. Peter standing at the pearly gates.  She goes on, "Each person's deeds will be weighed in a balance, and if the evil deeds outweigh the good deeds, the person will be condemned to the eternal flame. If the good deeds outweigh the evil deeds, then the person will be rewarded with paradise."

So basically, anyone, Muslim or not, can get into paradise simply by doing more good than evil.  And evil can be erased through repentance, so that doing more good than evil would seem to be a fairly easy thing to do.

Bonus: They also teach that God is merciful.  So... He might just show you mercy even if you've been a bastard.

So, what does it mean to do "good"?  Well, here Boys reveals his ignorance and his prejudices about what is Good in Islam.  He already believes Islam to require the conversion of the whole world, through violent means if necessary.  Dying in the service of that conversion is the ultimate good.

This is also what I was taught.

Davies-Stofka claims, however, that good means something different: "A person's ultimate destiny, whether it is heaven or hell, depends on the degree to which that person intended and acted as God desires, with justice and mercy toward others." 

On islamqa.com, a site intended for providing helpful support to Muslims from Muslims, they list 8 possible things you can do to be good, such as praying (3 different items on the list include prayer), reading the Qur'an, and "visiting the sick and giving charity."  Notably absent on the list is "strapping a bomb to your chest and running into a crowded arena" or "attempting to convert others by lies and coercion." 

So the "goals of Islam" include charitable works?  Yeah, I'm OK with Muslims lying to advance those goals.

Boys then connects those two highly disparate dots by proclaiming that as a result of their lack of salvation and their pursuit of the expansion of Islam, lying means getting into Heaven.  He's just made lying a "virtue" rather than a necessary evil.

Of course, then he goes completely off the deep end, proclaiming that the only sure way of entering Heaven is to die a martyr, and,

"Most Muslims will not have the 'opportunity' to become a martyr in this war between Islam and the rest of the world and make no mistake every true Muslim must be involved in making America (or the nation where he lives) a Muslim nation. Since Muslims are limited in their ability to die for the cause, they can help the cause by supporting terrorists with money, succor, and cover."

Wow.  Just wow.  First of all, this assumes the moral imperative to make America a Muslim nation.  I'm relatively certain the Qur'an never mention America, but hey, I've been wrong before.

But more importantly, it assumes that all Muslims believe that terrorists will be successful in their conversion of America by attacking it.

If Muslims really wanted to make America into a Muslim nation, the first thing they would do would be to blow up a small piece of it, because... uhm... you always attack countries when you want them to love you?

Where did Muslims in Boys' reality get their playbook?  The Republican War Room?

4 comments:

  1. First of all, you do not need to speak Arabic to read the holly Quaran; it is already translated to English. this word does Not even exist in the Holly Quaran. I am just wondering that how do you conduct research without looking or reading the main resource "the holly Quran"!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What I meant was that I didn't read it the way it was intended. I did read parts of it in English as part of the research, but quoting those parts wasn't necessary for the argument. Anyone who believes that all Muslims are lying would believe that any English translation is merely part of that lie, so quoting it wouldn't help make the case.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. (the second comment was a copy of the first - apparently the submit form went through twice - so I deleted it)

    ReplyDelete